My placement: Northville High School. The community at whole: the most conservative in Wayne County (by far), majority upper-middle class. Yet, it seems that, in the attempt to remain frugal and save as much money as possible for a rainy day (or another recession), that the school as a whole does not have the technology one would expect upon arrival (or more current textbooks/other materials/smaller class sizes...but that's another story). However, this is not necessarily something horrible, or causing the students a disadvantage--almost every student, at least in my classes, has at least an iPhone/SmartPhone, if not also a laptop, iPad, Kindle, Chromebook, etc. When taking into account the larger picture, Northville does have a decent amount of technology available, at the very least, for teacher use. For example, I have yet to see a room without a SmartBoard. There is even a SmartBoard in the library available for student use...whether these, even, are completely necessary is still up for debate in my book. But then again, I have a feeling I'm missing some of what they can do. Yes, they are quite nice for taking typed, easy-to-read notes in class that can later be posted on a Website for student review; however, I have yet to see them accomplish anything that cannot be done with a bit of creativity, a whiteboard or chalkboard, and a good old projector. Thus far, I believe my favorite aspect of a classroom is the whiteboard--I'm a mover and a writer, enjoying the greater movement offered by a normal board, unbound by a keyboard. More modern projectors can also be hooked up to computers in order to display online content on-screen, which works well for world language classrooms when trying to show aspects of the culture, clips of videos, newspaper articles, etc. But for other SmartBoard skeptics out there, there is this little guy:

Yes, they can be useful, but do they really transform education? The greatest take-away from examining technology in my placement relates to the SAMR model...is it transforming education? Is it augmenting learning (which SmartBoards can definitely do)? Or are some of the sources of technology just a substitution for teaching? Like the video, once thought to be revolutionary for teacher practice, some technologies are best only for the teachers, allowing them to take a break, especially if they do nothing with the new material they are giving students to work with. Can videos and YouTube clips be beneficial to learning, and take it in new directions not necessarily possible before? Definitely! But not if teachers passively show a video and expect students to passively take in the information...more of an active process is necessary.
That being said, my MT does do a swell job in using the SmartBoard as both a notetaking tool and as a way to show students newspaper articles and YouTube clips...what really surprised me about Northville was the lack of things like Google Chromebooks, laptop carts, easily accessible computer labs, and the like. If laptops are needed in class, it would most likely need to be a BYOD day, which, apart from bringing SmartPhones, I am reluctant to do, mainly because I do not know how many of my students have laptops...I could always ask, however. EdMoto is used as a convenient, well-organized way for students to both turn work in and receive feedback for that work...look forward to a Webinar I and some of my colleagues will be creating around the educational benefits and uses of Edmoto next week! In addition, grades and absences are reported using MyStar, a convenient way for students (and possibly their parents as well) can keep track of how they are doing in school. As a whole, Northville is a healthy, safe learning environment with a fair amount of technology...often, the value in technology is how one uses it, after all, not in the device itself.
What about you? I would love to hear about the technologies offered in your schools, and how you use them in order to teach in ways that may not have been possible without technology.